The Naked Anabaptist

Book:THe Naked Anabaptist

The Anabaptist are a often forgotten part of the christian church. We know about the split which separated the eastern Orthodox churches from the Roman church. In the west we are more familiar with the Reformation, where the Protestant churches split from the Roman Catholic church. But there was a third group in the Reformation, persecuted and maligned by both sides, but growing in influence today – the Anabaptists.

This book outlines what Anabaptists believe, and why they are coming into greater prominence.

A very little history

The Reformation was a time of great change – politically as well as in the church. Alongside reform movements in the church were movements for greater rights for peasants. The reformers generally avoiding rocking the political boat, but other christians supported both reform movements. While there were many and varied expressions of these reform movements across Europe, the Anabaptists came to be a label for many of them.

Because they emphasised believers’ baptism and didn’t recognise child baptism as valid (‘Anabaptist’ literally indicates ‘second baptism’, a title given to them by their enemies), they were a threat to church authorities and the the growing Protestant movement. And because they tended to support the peasant movements, they were a threat to state authorities as well. As a result they were persecuted by both Catholics and Protestants, with thousands of them being martyred.

Some Anabaptists supported violent revolution, and were decisively defeated, but most were pacifists, and reacted to persecution by retreating into more separated communities. Their vision for their communities and for society was still radical, but their opportunities were limited. The Mennonites, the Amish and other small groups grew out of this movement.

Anabaptists today

While the Anabaptists are not well known by most christians, they have created a legacy that is becoming increasingly valuable today. In its four main chapters, this excellent book outlines the Anabaptist emphases:

  1. It is important to follow Jesus, not just depend on him for salvation. The Anabaptists tend to take Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount much more seriously than other christians, and see his teachings as being the focal point of the Bible and the key to understanding it.
  2. Since Constantine first adopted and promoted christianity in the fourth century (thus beginning the political and cultural force called ‘Christendom’), the institutional church has become too closely associated with the state, with wealth, power and privilege. Jesus calls us to be servants and to identify with the poor and under-privileged. Modern Anabaptists therefore tend to welcome the end of the age of Christendom, believing it will force followers of Jesus to return to a more radical lifestyle.
  3. “Churches are called to be committed communities of discipleship and mission, places of friendship, mutual accountability, and multivoiced worship.” Church leadership should be consultative. Christians should live as simply as possible and care for God’s creation.
  4. Christians should seek to be salt in society. Non-violence (and hence pacifism), environmental care, social and economic justice and peaceful conflict resolution are all activities and goals important to modern Anabaptists.


I believe all these emphases are relevant and important for today, and can easily sit alongside and inform more traditional church programs and goals. The evidence suggests that the western church is facing greater challenges in the future (see The future for the church), and I believe we need to re-examine our understanding of the gospel and mission (see What message?). These emphases are relevant to these needs.

I thoroughly recommend this book as a catalyst for thought, planning and action. I will blog in coming weeks about some of these emphases, in the hope I may encourage some of us to new understandings and action.

Further reading


Following Jesus


3 thoughts on “The Naked Anabaptist

  1. Robert Martin says:

    I think if you take point 2 above, you’ll better understand my reaction to the Michael Shank article on “The Hill”. Again, it’s not a matter of whether or not I think Democrats or Republicans are the “right” way, but whether or not a Christian, let alone an Anabaptist, should be advocating for a particular party at all.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. unklee says:

    I understand you feel strongly about this, and I guess you have a heritage of being detached from partisan politics. But while I agree that churches generally should avoid supporting a particular party (and thereby potentially alienating some of the members), I can’t see why individual christians should not. In fact, to be salt and light in the world, some christians probably should, just as some of us should probably be involved in all sorts of other organisations.


  3. Tad Davis says:

    It’s interesting to note the similarities between the anabaptist distinctives and those of Christian Anarchism. Each focuses attention on the life and teachings of Jesus, particularly his teachings in the Sermon on the Mount. Each adopts the “Constantinian Fall” thesis regarding the church’s unholy alliance with the state. Each emphasizes the missional and communal nature of the church. Each tends to be committed to non-violence (though in neither case is this last distinctive universally held).

    Liked by 1 person

Please leave a comment - anonymous is OK, but please identify yourself with a username. An email address is needed if you want notification of new comments. Please be courteous and constructive - see the Comment policy (link in the footer).

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s